I apologize for any offense I might have caused by my statement about Christianity and decision making. Of course I figured I'd get backlash considering I don't know anyone that reads this that isn't Christian - but I think the problem is that I may have been unclear. I will grant that members of the 44% can have good policies for the environment or toward progress. This must be true, as long as all presidents aren't lying to us because, unless I'm mistaken, every president in at least the last 100 years have been "avowed" christians, and yet we've had progress. That being said I still hold that a true belief, not a hope, a
belief that Jesus will in fact return in the next 50 or so years is not compatible with coming to good, lasting solutions for present or future problems. I would argue that when someone attests to truly hold such a belief as that, and yet does propose constructive solutions, this is because of a disconnect in belief or them being in fact less sure of this idea than they're claiming.
For one, according to a literal reading of Revelation, the world has to break down and slip into chaos in so many areas in order for Jesus's return to happen. I can only speak for myself, but I do in fact remember telling someone several years ago, when a suicide bomber drove a boat full of bombs into a US Ship anchored...somewhere in the Middle East...that yes it's sad, but in a way it's exciting because it is setting up for the end times and Jesus's return, with everything going on over there in the "sand box." At that time I would have considered myself a fundamentalist, not quite an extremist. Among fundamentalists
at the very least I really don't think I was
alone in this sentiment. So to some people the collapse of civilization is in fact cause for celebration. These people are on the fringe, of course, but I don't think that everyday Christians can help but see at least some silver lining in similar, especially Middle-eastern, events. At the very least, I don't think we want these fringe individuals making world decisions - or environmental decisions for that matter, seeing as the worst for those of us on earth, could very well be the best to get Jesus back here.
Secondly, if you are truly positive that Jesus will return in the next 50 years(which is the situation of 22 of the 44%, the other 22 being "reasonably convinced") what motivation could you possibly have for fixing the world's problems? If I knew my house was being bulldozed next week, my vaccum would be one of the first things I'd pack. I may make provisional solutions - but ozone depletion, overfishing, oil spills, global warming - there will be no my children's children's children to suffer from these things anyway. So I will grant that it is a generalization for me to say that none should have a say in the future, and I will again reiterate that I don't think any of you who are reading this truly believe Jesus
will - not
may or
I hope he will - come in the next 50 years. I'm guessing this is the case with many people (otherwise what could their reason possibly be for wanting to improve anything if it's all gonna burn inside 50 years anyway). So people in that 44% could make decent decisions regarding the future - However, that is due to being unsecure in the belief of Jesus's imminent return, not because of a possible harmony between the belief and good decision making.
Regarding atheists: I think it's important to learn more than propaganda regarding what atheists really think.
This is a good general article about what atheists position regarding a lot of the things I see brought up. Obviously it doesn't represent ALL atheists points of view but it's fairly representative. In regards to an atheist getting elected (I'm responding specifically to my dad's comment now), at this point that seems almost
impossible. So no worries.